In his September 9, 2010 article in The Bond Buyer entitled “Judgment Aids Investors in Citi Case,” author Dan Seymour describes a recent Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration award of more than $1.8 million in favor of MAT/ASTA investors as “[a] grand-slam judgment [that] has emboldened the lawyers and investors seeking to recoup losses on $2 billion in municipal arbitrage funds run by Citigroup.”
The amount of the award, while very substantial, is not the focus of the article. The reason why it is making news is the arbitration panel’s specific finding that Citigroup was guilty of negligent mismanagement of the MAT/ASTA funds, as well as negligent supervision of their employees.
Citing J. Boyd Page, senior partner of Page Perry, LLC, Mr. Seymour noted that this was the first time that arbitrators explicitly found that Citigroup mismanaged the funds.
The decision is pivotal because it opens the door to claims by earlier investors that might otherwise be barred by statutes of limitation.
Mr. Page estimates that these claims represent $500 million to $700 million of the total $2 billion invested in the MAT/ASTA funds, according to the article. “It tells a lot of people that there are still very viable claims,” Mr. Page was quoted as saying.
MAT/ASTA was a series of leveraged municipal arbitrage hedge funds offered by Citigroup Fixed Income Alternatives and sold through Smith Barney and Citigroup Private Bankers.
MAT/ASTA was marketed only to high net worth clients of the firm as a fixed income alternative. In truth the MAT/ASTA funds were risky investments that exposed investors to a 100 percent or more loss of principal. The funds imploded in early 2008 causing catastrophic losses to investors.
Citigroup told MAT/ASTA investors that it would adhere to a strategy of buying municipal bonds when the prices were low (i.e., when the yield spread of munis over Treasuries was high) and selling them when prices were high (i.e., when that spread ratio was low).
Mr. Page and Robert Wayne Pearce, who represented the claimants in the arbitration that is the subject of Mr. Seymour’s article, uncovered evidence that Citigroup departed from these guidelines, buying when it should have been selling.
As a result of those efforts, they are in a unique position to establish that Citigroup mismanaged the MAT/ASTA funds.
A PRUDENT CASE APPROACH
Mr. Pearce, a former SEC attorney with over 40 years experience, focuses his practice on securities matters.
He is a member of the Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association and serves as Chairperson of the SPBCBA Securities Committee.
He has represented hundreds of investors in securities arbitration and have prosecuted multiple MAT/ASTA arbitration claims.
He is currently representing almost 50 clients throughout the country in MAT/ASTA cases.
The Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. follows a multi‑theory approach encompassing three separate bases for recovery, depending on the facts and circumstances of the particular investor’s case.
These include: (1) MAT/ASTA was a flawed investment product; (2) Citigroup and its affiliates misrepresented and failed to disclose material facts at the time the investor was sold the investment; and (3) Citigroup and its affiliates were guilty of negligent mismanagement of MAT/ASTA and negligent supervision of their employees.
We believe that this approach gives investors three separate bases for recovering damages and enhances the likelihood of an award. We prefer not to put all of our clients’ “eggs in one basket.”
If you are seeking a law firm with integrity, dedication, and substantial experience in MAT/ASTA fraud and mismanagement disputes, please schedule a confidential consultation with Mr. Pearce today.
Call our firm at 561-338-0037 or toll-free at 800-732-2889, or fill out our intake form to schedule your free consultation.
Rate this Post
Loading...